Laura Nix’s first narrative film, "The Politics of Fur," has
played to rapt audiences all over the world and will finally make its Boston
debut during the Boston Underground Film Festival, running September 26 -
October 4. Known primarily for her dozen-plus documentaries to date (she’s a
partner in Automat Pictures with Jeffrey Schwarz, whom she met while both were
working on HBO’s "The Celluloid Closet"), Nix has made a brave leap
into fiction -- semi-autobiographical fiction, as she reveals in the following
interview.
Whatever personal pain she may have experienced, she has managed to mediate it
with scintillating style and liberal splashes of humor -- an element all but
absent in the template she drew on, Fassbinder’s 1972 classic, "The
Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant." Like Petra, Nix’s Una (here a
super-sophisticated music industry honcho played by Katy Selverstone) takes up
with a questionable lover (Brynn Horrocks portrays "B." as a female
Sid Vicious), while relying on the ministrations of a submissive servant (T.
Jerram Young). Before long, the question of who’s dominating whom is wildly up
for grabs.
SM: What a striking movie! I’m curious about the process, and what came
when. How did the idea germinate? Were you directly inspired by
"Petra"? (Of course, there are huge divergences.)
Nix: I was trying to write a film about a relationship I had with a woman
in San Francisco that really stirred up a lot for me. I wanted to work in the
melodramatic form, but do so in a humorous way. I watched a number of films that
inspired me, including "The Bitter Tears," but also films by Douglas
Sirk, Pedro Almodovar, and Jacques Tati.
SM: Did you start out with an actress in mind -- Selverstone is
phenomenal -- and build it around her?
Nix: I went through a conventional casting process, guided by my casting
director Bill Ingram, who is exceptionally sharp and insightful. He had seen
Katy Selverstone in a play, and thought she was suited for the role. It was an
incredible day when she came in to read. It was one of those auditions where the
person literally walks in and says hello and I knew she was right for the part.
She’s an incredibly intelligent, powerful, and talented actress, and she
understood the myriad of layers that comprise Una on a deep level. My
collaboration with her to craft this character was one of the most rewarding
experiences of making the film.
SM: How would you compare your extensive experience making documentaries,
and the process of creating a fictional work? Did certain skills prove helpful?
Nix: Working with crews and constructing a story in scripting and editing
are skills that cross both genres. A narrative piece has a set of unique
requirements when writing, however, that I had to learn a lot about. The biggest
difference of course is working with actors, which is a unique process that you
don’t work in when making docs. I devoted a lot of time to start to learn how
to do that before embarking on this project, and can’t wait to make my next
film so I can learn more.
SM: Did the script change substantially in the course of filming?
Nix: Only in the last scene, where we changed Una’s focus and response
to her crisis. But in the rest of the film, there were some tweaks, and lots of
cuts, but the dialogue stayed the same. Even highly energized scenes, like the
last fight between B. and Una, were completely scripted.
SM: One of the salient differences between your film and "The Bitter
Tears" is the humor, which emerges in the interplay of the characters. Dick
is a real presence, and not just a cipher like Petra’s Marlene. How did you
envision this role, and was there a specific intent behind making him male?
Nix: The humor in the film is especially important to me. I find humor in
extremely emotional situations: I think we have to in order to survive. There
are just moments in life where you have to laugh at yourself and the
predicaments you find yourself in, especially in love. Dick is a character who
serves many functions, including some comic relief. He also illustrates how Una
doesn’t know where she ends and other people begin -- which we observe in
scenes like the sex scene in the kitchen.
SM: The social and sexual activity crosses lines that ordinarily seem
pretty rigidly defined. Does this reflect a wish (e.g., that lesbians and gays
become mutually more tolerant and inclusive) or an observation (i.e., that they
already are)?
Nix: Well, there is definitely a more open expression of sexuality in the
queer community, specifically in the gay male community. I wanted to poke fun at
some aspects of that, like the circuit scene and white parties, etc. But the
open sex in the movie mostly serves as an illustration of the total lack of
boundaries in Una’s house.
SM: I’m impressed with the overall design: how minimalism represents
the ultimate in trendy luxe, and also represents Una’s inner emptiness. Was
this part of your vision from the start?
Nix: Yes, absolutely. My production designer Mark Guirguis and I had many
conversations about how Una’s goal in life was to pare down and simplify, and
we wanted her physical environment to reflect that change. I’ve met a lot of
people who are in this phase. As they try and get healthy, physically and
psychologically, they start to throw everything away, and you go over to their
house and they have like two pillows on the floor. I never can relate to this
because I am a total pack rat and always very cluttered. But more importantly,
the design also resulted from economic necessity. We couldn’t create a
complicated and busy look with the resources that I had.
SM: The film has already shown all over the world: in Oslo, London,
Bergen (the setting of Petra), Torino, Barcelona, Sao Paolo, New York,
Nashville, Miami, Los Angeles, Hawaii, New Zealand. Have local reactions varied,
or is there a thread?
Nix: The response has been incredibly favorable, and we’ve been really
excited by its reception. We won a number of awards over the last year, starting
in Los Angeles with Best Feature and Best Actress at Outfest 2002. Since then we
won an Audience Award in Torino, Italy, Best First Feature in Miami Gay and
Lesbian, and Best Feature in Honolulu Gay and Lesbian. We’ve also gotten great
critical feedback, including some good reviews in Film Comment, Variety,
the LA Weekly, etc.
I’m totally fascinated by how different audiences react in different cities --
especially in relation to the humor. In some cities people howl through the
whole film (Los Angeles and New York) and in other cities you could hear a pin
drop (Torino). I think it plays differently depending on a whole host of
factors: the language barrier, and people’s knowledge of Los Angeles. There
are a lot of ‘in’ jokes.
SM: Una is, of course, a control freak par excellence. As writer,
director, and co-producer, do you identify with any of her traits?
Nix: Well, let’s just say that Una is a combination of many people, my
mother, some of my old bosses, and me. I couldn’t have written her if I didn’t
relate to her in some ways. Una is complicated -- she’s vulnerable,
egocentric, and above all a very powerful and charismatic woman. I think Una --
like many women, including myself -- has a conflicted relationship to her power:
she isn’t wholly comfortable in it, doesn’t feel like she always deserves to
have it, and thus acts out her shame in inappropriate and terrible ways. In that
sense she serves as a type of nightmare for me -- a reminder of what not
to become.
SM: Another big difference between your film and "The Bitter
Tears" is that we really feel for Una -- partly because Selverstone is so
touching, but it also seems to be written in. Stylish as the movie is, the
ironic distance is lessened. Did you want viewers to be touched in this way?
Nix: An earlier version of my film was much more ironic, and it felt
empty and flat. It ended with Una outside on her hands and knees screaming for
her pet tiger, and it didn’t work at all. It’s very easy to make fun of Una,
but it doesn’t feel as honest, and it avoids the emotional trickiness of the
piece. Throughout the entire process it was always a question of: Do we play
this comically or do we go for the gut? Or can we do both? When Una is flailing
about on the floor throwing shoes and sobbing, I think it’s both. I’ve seen
audiences cry and I’ve seen audiences laugh during this scene, and I don’t
think either is inappropriate. I very much want Una to touch the fear in women
that expressing what you really want might end up making you alone. Despite her
bravado, and self-help talk, Una is desperately afraid of being alone, yet her
actions virtually assure that she will be. She hasn’t figured out how to have
agency in the world and still be intimate with someone, and I think many of us
struggle with these issues.